Procurement teams do not want marketing. They want clear, consistent answers about accessibility. Our vendor guidance helps you respond to VPAT / ACR requests, complete accessibility questionnaires accurately, and align on what evidence reviewers expect — so deals don't stall in compliance review.
By Need
When a buyer asks for an ACR, they're trying to assess accessibility risk before purchase. We help you respond with clear scope, correct terminology, and defensible statements that match what your product actually supports.
We help vendors answer accessibility questions in RFPs and vendor questionnaires without overclaiming or creating contradictions across documents. You get consistent language that procurement teams can review quickly.
Tools and opinions are not evidence. We help define what to test, what to document, and how to present results so reviewers see a credible evaluation path, not a template filled with guesses.
Buyer Perspective
Typically, procurement reviewers will be looking for these three main items in a VPAT:
The product version(s), platform(s) and workflow(s) covered by this VPAT submission.
Statements regarding compliance which do not contradict each other throughout the different sections of the VPAT.
A credible test base for the VPAT, as opposed to simply making general claims such as "We comply with WCAG" or "we use an overlay."
Common Vendor Mistake
Providing a VPAT that looks like a brochure rather than a formal report, self-reporting without third-party evaluation, or using "Supports" too many times without detailing limitations. Self-reported VPATs are routinely rejected during procurement review. These submissions trigger follow-up questions, delays, and possible escalation to legal or accessibility reviewers.
Accuracy
A VPAT is a template. An ACR is the completed report produced using that template. There is no official VPAT certification and no universal "pass/fail" label. What matters is whether your statements are accurate, testable, and transparent.
Vendor guidance helps you avoid the two extremes that procurement rejects: vague claims and absolute claims that are not supported by evidence. Instead, you submit clear, scoped reporting that procurement teams can interpret and compare across vendors.
"We're accessible" or "Fully compliant" — vague, absolute, or self-reported claims not supported by independent evaluation.
Clear, scoped reporting with evidence-backed conformance statements that reviewers can interpret.
Process
We review the buyer request, procurement language, and which VPAT edition or standards they expect.
We define what product version, platforms, and workflows your documentation covers. This reduces ambiguity and protects you from accidental overpromises.
We rewrite accessibility responses so they are consistent across VPAT/ACR, RFP answers, and vendor questionnaires.
We identify what evidence is missing, what testing should be performed, and what should be documented to strengthen credibility.
We help prepare a clean, review-friendly response package that minimizes procurement back-and-forth.
We help you respond quickly with the right scope, the right terminology, and the right expectations.
We align the document with what the buyer asked for, instead of mixing standards in a way that confuses review.
We turn long accessibility questionnaires into consistent, defensible answers that match your real product behavior.
We help you write "Supports / Partially Supports" statements that procurement can interpret without guesswork.
If limitations exist, we help you describe them clearly and pair them with a realistic plan (instead of hiding them).
We reduce internal friction between product, engineering, legal, and sales by keeping accessibility claims consistent.
Deliverables
You receive a procurement-ready set of accessibility responses designed for real buyer review. This includes precise VPAT / ACR language, structured questionnaire and RFP answers, and documentation aligned with verified testing results.
Trusted by teams at
Related
Evidence-based testing that produces procurement-ready ACR reports.
Learn moreStructured support for accessibility documentation during government procurement.
Learn moreHands-on testing for websites and web apps against Section 508 standards.
Learn moreFAQ
Schedule a consultation to align your accessibility documentation with what buyers expect.
Free Consultation