A VPAT is only credible when it's backed by real evaluation. Our VPAT testing services assess your product against the standards your buyers request — then document findings clearly in an Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR). You get evidence-based reporting that procurement teams can actually review.
The Reality
A VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) is the reporting structure. The Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) is the completed document procurement teams evaluate when making purchasing decisions. The credibility of that ACR depends entirely on the quality and depth of the testing behind it.
Effective VPAT accessibility testing begins with defined scope, documented environments, and validation of real product behavior across relevant standards. Findings are then translated into precise, defensible conformance language that procurement reviewers can rely on.
There is no official VPAT certification and no universal pass or fail badge. What determines whether your documentation supports approval is accuracy, transparency, and evidence-backed reporting. VPAT testing is not a form to complete. It is a structured evaluation process that directly impacts procurement outcomes.
Treating a VPAT as a form to "fill out" without real testing — leads to rejected ACRs and procurement delays.
Self-reported VPATs are routinely rejected during procurement review. Third-party evaluation is required for credibility.
Evidence-based evaluation with structured methodology that produces defensible ACRs for real procurement use.
Scope
We test what buyers care about: whether users can complete real tasks using assistive technology and alternative input methods, and whether results can be documented consistently.
By Product Type
If you sell into federal or public-sector procurement, VPAT Section 508 testing helps document conformance in a format reviewers expect. Results are written clearly, with realistic support statements and scoped evidence.
For web products, testing is aligned with WCAG-based criteria commonly referenced in VPAT reporting. The goal is not "perfect marketing language" — it's a report that matches real product behavior.
After testing, we produce the ACR using the correct VPAT edition and help you finalize wording so it is consistent, defensible, and not over-claimed.
We define what is in-scope (product version, platforms, core workflows) so the report is honest and reviewable.
Automated scans help, but manual validation catches what tools miss in real interactions and workflows.
We test with assistive tech patterns relevant to your product type, so results reflect real use, not assumptions.
Findings are documented in consistent "Supports / Partially Supports / Does Not Support" style wording with meaningful notes.
Each section is backed by what was actually observed, so the ACR holds up under follow-up questions.
A VPAT/ACR is a point-in-time snapshot. We help teams plan updates when the product changes.
Standards
VPAT editions are designed to match what buyers request. The right choice depends on your market and procurement requirements. Some buyers request Section 508-focused reporting, others expect WCAG-based reporting, and some procurement workflows align with EU frameworks.
The key rule: pick the edition that matches the customer request, then test and report consistently against it. Over-reporting or mixing standards without clarity is one of the fastest ways to trigger procurement questions.
Buyer Perspective
A report that reads like marketing copy usually fails review faster than a report that admits limitations but documents them cleanly.
What exactly was tested and what product version is covered
Conformance statements that match the evidence and don't contradict themselves
Realistic "Partially Supports" statements where limitations exist, plus a remediation direction
Process
We confirm product version, platforms, key workflows, and the VPAT edition required.
We test core experiences using a mix of automated checks and structured manual testing.
We document results in the VPAT format with clear conformance statements and supporting notes.
We align language, remove ambiguity, and ensure the report is procurement-ready.
If your product ships frequently, we recommend an update cadence so the ACR stays accurate.
Trusted by teams at
Related
Help answering accessibility questions in RFPs and vendor assessments consistently.
Learn moreStructured support for accessibility documentation during government procurement.
Learn moreHands-on testing for websites and web apps against Section 508 standards.
Learn moreFAQ
Schedule a consultation to discuss your product, target market, and documentation needs.
Free Consultation